Username: Save?
Password:
Home Forum Links Search Login Register*
    News: Welcome to the TechnoWorldInc! Community!
Recent Updates
[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 05:05:06 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[September 09, 2024, 12:27:25 PM]

[September 09, 2024, 12:27:25 PM]

[September 09, 2024, 12:27:25 PM]
Subscriptions
Get Latest Tech Updates For Free!
Resources
   Travelikers
   Funistan
   PrettyGalz
   Techlap
   FreeThemes
   Videsta
   Glamistan
   BachatMela
   GlamGalz
   Techzug
   Vidsage
   Funzug
   WorldHostInc
   Funfani
   FilmyMama
   Uploaded.Tech
   MegaPixelShop
   Netens
   Funotic
   FreeJobsInc
   FilesPark
Participate in the fastest growing Technical Encyclopedia! This website is 100% Free. Please register or login using the login box above if you have already registered. You will need to be logged in to reply, make new topics and to access all the areas. Registration is free! Click Here To Register.
+ Techno World Inc - The Best Technical Encyclopedia Online! » Forum » THE TECHNO CLUB [ TECHNOWORLDINC.COM ] » Techno Articles » Management
  How the Four Dimensions of Culture Affect Business Leadership
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: How the Four Dimensions of Culture Affect Business Leadership  (Read 613 times)
Daniel Franklin
TWI Hero
**********


Karma: 3
Offline Offline

Posts: 16647


View Profile Email
How the Four Dimensions of Culture Affect Business Leadership
« Posted: November 08, 2007, 02:05:38 PM »




In today's global marketplace, it's important to understand the differences between cultures, as well as how those differences affect the way you do business. One of the ways to understand culture is to look at it in the four dimensions established by Hofstede:

1. Individualism vs. Collectivism
2. Small or Large Scale Power Distance
3. Uncertainty Avoidance
4. Masculinity vs. Femininity

The first dimension is Individualism vs. Collectivism. The issue in this dimension is the relation between an individual’s interests and the interests of the group. In individualist societies, the individual exercises loose ties between others, is concerned with his own self-interests, and possibly the interests of his immediate family. Individualist societies normally have a large degree of freedom and liberty, which encourages people to pursue personal goals and ambitions. In collectivistic societies, individuals are not so much concerned with their own interests as they are the interests of their group, which can include immediate and extended families. Every country theoretically fits somewhere along the Individualist-Collectivist continuum.

The second dimension measures Small or Large Scale Power Distance. The fundamental idea is how each society deals with inequality. All societies suffer from inequality, but some are more unequal than others. Some of the variables which contribute to inequality are physical size, intellectual giftedness, wealth, and heredity. In organizations, scholars like Hofstede contend that the degree of Power Distance is associated with centralization and autocratic leadership.

Uncertainty Avoidance is the third dimension. In short, this dimension deals with how each society copes with the uncertainty of an unknown future. Some societies accept more readily this uncertainty without much fear. These "Weak Uncertainty Avoidance" societies take life as it comes, do not work as hard, are willing to take risks, and are very tolerant of almost any behavior and opinion. On the other hand, other societies experience anxiety because of an uncertain future. Also known as "Strong Uncertainty Avoidance" societies, these cultures are marked by emotional stress and aggressiveness.

Finally, the fourth dimension is Masculinity vs. Femininity. The issue is role divisions between men and women in society. In every society, men and women perform certain roles; men normally take more dominant roles, while women are concerned with more caring and supportive roles. One can use these types of roles to describe similarities between cultures. "Masculine" cultures value a high degree of achievement, money, and work first. More "feminine" societies value quality of life, relationships, and helping others before power and money.

From these four dimensions, we can understand why it is wrong to assume or assign one management theory to work for all cultures and societies. Much of the writing on management over the past couple of decades, especially about leadership, models of organization, and motivation, have been written from an American point of view. Economically, this points to the importance of the US economy during this period, but culturally it does not consider the impact on other societies.

While more works needs to be done to understand the entire scope of the role culture plays in management, understanding that there are differences, and using these dimensions to explore them, is the first step.

Carmelo Di Salvo was born and raised in Buffalo, New York and received his B.A in economics from the State University of New York in Buffalo. He graduated from Regent University in 1995 with his M.B.A. In the years following, he spent time working for businesses like Liberty Tax Service and RBC Centura, as well as several years in the hospitality industry. He returned to Regent in 2003 to pursue a Doctorate in Strategic Leadership. His current focus is on teaching and consulting in the areas of strategic leadership, foresight analysis and creativity in the workplace.

Check out more on this topic at http://www.northstarconsultingllc.com.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Carmelo_Di_Salvo

Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Copyright © 2006-2023 TechnoWorldInc.com. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Page created in 0.153 seconds with 24 queries.