Username: Save?
Password:
Home Forum Links Search Login Register*
    News: Welcome to the TechnoWorldInc! Community!
Recent Updates
[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[November 08, 2024, 04:31:03 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 05:05:06 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[October 17, 2024, 04:53:18 PM]

[September 09, 2024, 12:27:25 PM]

[September 09, 2024, 12:27:25 PM]

[September 09, 2024, 12:27:25 PM]
Subscriptions
Get Latest Tech Updates For Free!
Resources
   Travelikers
   Funistan
   PrettyGalz
   Techlap
   FreeThemes
   Videsta
   Glamistan
   BachatMela
   GlamGalz
   Techzug
   Vidsage
   Funzug
   WorldHostInc
   Funfani
   FilmyMama
   Uploaded.Tech
   MegaPixelShop
   Netens
   Funotic
   FreeJobsInc
   FilesPark
Participate in the fastest growing Technical Encyclopedia! This website is 100% Free. Please register or login using the login box above if you have already registered. You will need to be logged in to reply, make new topics and to access all the areas. Registration is free! Click Here To Register.
+ Techno World Inc - The Best Technical Encyclopedia Online! » Forum » THE TECHNO CLUB [ TECHNOWORLDINC.COM ] » Techno Articles » Management
  Sales Compensation: Creating Performance Clarity
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Sales Compensation: Creating Performance Clarity  (Read 521 times)
Sabbani Raju
Full Member
***


Karma: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 249


View Profile Email
Sales Compensation: Creating Performance Clarity
« Posted: November 30, 2007, 11:57:28 AM »


A prospective client called several days ago and asked: “What should I pay a great performer and what should I pay a salesperson who doesn’t meet expectations?”

Assessing sales compensation effectiveness from the perspective of expected market pay levels is far too limiting. Sales compensation should be evaluated within the context of the entire performance and pay range for the job performed and results delivered. Furthermore, sales compensation plans and pay levels should be created or critiqued in the same way that one assesses any other investment geared toward making money or improving future business.

Companies expect a substantial revenue and profit return on their investment in sales compensation. For example:

1. A company that pays a 10% commission invests $1.00 to net $9.00 – a 9:1 return on its commission investment.

2. A company that provides a $25,000 bonus opportunity to a field sales representative for generating $2,500,000 in revenue does so in the expectation that it will receive $100 for each dollar of bonus paid.

So how do you increase the odds of getting a substantial return on sales compensation and achieve a reasonable compensation cost of sales? First, you build a clear understanding of how sales resources influence the sale so that your sales force is precisely focused on factors that matter. Supporting the sales effort through astute organizational definition and performance-driven pay creates the link between sales effort and delivered results.

Every bit as important as incorporating the drivers of performance into the sales incentive plan is the creation of an effective connection between pay and results. This means you need to make sure total pay is incentive-weighted and variable compensation is leveraged – configured to produce market-leading payouts for high performance. Low performers must be paid meaningfully below market, creating significant performance-based incentive payout differentiation. Aligning your incentive payout profile with the marketplace doesn’t adequately pay “winners” like winners and “losers” like losers.

You can reveal the amount of incentive payout differentiation in your sales incentive plan by examining your incentive payout multiples. Compare your payouts for high performance to the awards paid for low performance. The high performance payout divided by the low performance payout is your incentive multiple. The multiples across your performance distribution (e.g., “target” vs. “minimum acceptable,” “excellent” vs. “target,” and “outstanding” vs. “excellent”) should accelerate, recognizing the value of achieving increasingly difficult performance levels. You can test your incentive payout differentiation against the market by comparing your multiples to the market’s 50th vs. 25th, 75th vs. 50th and 90th vs. 75th percentile incentive payouts.

Best-practice companies have high performance sales cultures. Their strategies for acquiring and retaining business are aggressive. Losing profitable revenue growth that was hard won isn’t acceptable. Goals at the salesperson level are stretched.

High performing companies are intolerant of, and pay stingily for, below goal performance. Rewards for high performance are significant. Their incentive payout at “outstanding” performance is at least four times the award at “target” performance and as much as twenty-five times the payout at “minimum acceptable” performance. But, they also know that sales compensation alone won’t drive high performance. And so they employ an integrated approach toward performance management, emphasizing sales leadership, training, sales focus, communication, performance measurement and pride of achievement.

John F. Tallitsch is the founder of TopMark, LLC, a consulting boutique specializing in sales effectiveness and sales compensation. TopMark helps companies create finely-tuned, results-oriented sales capabilities through solutions encompassing: customer segmentation and targeting; sales strategies; sales force and territory design; performance-driven sales incentives; and talent strategies. For additional thoughts by TopMark on sales management issues visit http://www.top-mark.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=John_Tallitsch

Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Copyright © 2006-2023 TechnoWorldInc.com. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
Page created in 0.124 seconds with 24 queries.